User talk:Niffweed17
Socionics article
[edit]The article that you linked would indeed support that section except that it itself does not list any references. Its not really a secondary source. I understand your point about socionics not having many secondary sources yet, so if that page is all there is, it may have to work. WP:VER has some guidelines about what makes a verifiable source, but as with anything, there are always exceptions. --Chuck Sirloin 16:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Aops, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Aops is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Aops, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
New York City Meetup
[edit]
|
New York City Meetup
|
The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 20:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
...to the next New York City Meetup!
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
New mailing list
[edit]There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
You are invited!
[edit]|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Stuyvesant High School has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.
AfD
[edit]Hi. You commented on a previous AfD debate on the article Hattrick. There is a new AfD here. Regards, BastunBaStun not BaTsun 05:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008
[edit]|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: You are invited!
[edit]|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).
We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
You're invited!
[edit]|
|
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).
We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: You're invited!
[edit]
|
New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza
|
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.
There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
[edit]|
New York City Meetup |
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Socionics deletion debate
[edit]It's a good exercise in the study of extremism. I'm thinking that Mango may respond to a request for mediation/negotiation. He's an extremist; that much is plain considering he's evidently not read the article or tried to understand it. He just sees it as "not notable" under his schema and that's that. I don't think he can enlarge his schema voluntarily... he must adopt it through some means or another.
It's just like how you tend to assume you're in opposition to someone on ethical grounds unless an outside party suggests otherwise. But in that case, I guess that other party wouldn't be allowed to take sides or, even have taken a side in the past...? Tcaudilllg (talk) 01:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I also noticed, for the first time, that you're incorporating information from Wikisocion into the wiki articles here. That's against Wikipedia's guidelines, I think. Tcaudilllg (talk) 02:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- If you wrote those articles originally, then Wikisocion can't claim them, only the copies. Would you mind if I removed the Wikisocion notices? You've done a good job, BTW. Tcaudilllg (talk) 23:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- lets discuss this if and when they don't get deleted, because it looks like they will be. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens (talk) 02:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nah I think it'll pass. It's looking more and more like a "no consensus" vote. I've just got to rally people strongly enough that the admin in charge has to make a decision: do they keep their adminship, or do they lose it? But if it doesn't go our way then all hell will break lose between the inclusionists and the deletionists, because there will be an "admin war" between the two camps. The key is to mobilize the inclusionists, and with 1500 admins you can bet there are inclusionists out there. Tcaudilllg (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- there is no consensus between inclusionism and deletionism, nor is anyone going to go nuts over one article. either way, this discussion is both moot, and if not moot, likely to descend into an unresolvable argument. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Template:Wswiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:20, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles
[edit]I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.
I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.
Thank you.
Vyeh (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.
Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:28, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The article PokerStars Big Game has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:27, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
<3
[edit]
|
Athanais (talk) 17:56, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
Template:EIE Model A has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:EII Model A has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Stuyvesant High School Featured Article Review
[edit]The Stuyvesant High School article has been listed at Featured Article Review at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Stuyvesant High School/archive2. Concerns expressed by User:TenPoundHammer include:
- Very many portions of the article are unsourced.
- The article's structure is very sloppy, with loads of very short paragraphs and standalone sentences. A major copy edit is needed. (For instance, nearly every sentence in "History" begins with "In [year]…".)
- Dubious lists ("Other publications" and "summary of floors") that are also unsourced.
- Entirely unsourced segments ("SING!").
- "In popular culture" is a mess of trivia.
- Another editor also raised concern that some of the text seems promotional. I tagged at least one section ("strength in areas such as math and science").
- I also see a very high number of primary sources.
Editors are invited to address the issues in order to prevent this article from being delisted from FA.
As someone who was notified on previous FARs, I thought you might be interested. RossPatterson (talk) 22:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Niffweed17. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Tarrog.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused with no apparent encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mattbr 13:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
