Jump to content

User:Winhunter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 217 0 0 100 Open 17:20, 25 December 2024 1 day, 9 hours no report


Articles I...

[edit]

Created

[edit]

Expanded significantly

[edit]

My other accounts

[edit]

My bookmarks

[edit]
Wikipedia

Wikipedia

[edit]
Category

Category

[edit]
Misc

Misc

[edit]
Tools

Tools

[edit]
Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 46
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 111
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 81
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 25
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 49
Requested RD1 redactions 3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 9
Open sockpuppet investigations 24
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

[edit]

Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]

CSD / PRODs

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 1
Vandalism 0
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 2
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 6
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 24 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 13 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

[edit]
Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Presbyopia

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BTSZ has been causing problems again. Protection recently expired. Note the length of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar/Archive. Leijurv (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Marven Gardens

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jet Pilot (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Nürburgring

[edit]

Reason: Continued addition of incorrect information by a range of IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:26, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Tubbo

[edit]

Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Doxxing and vandalism, User:SpaceFan1233 keep adding private info in one of the edits even after the page got protected, the user also added a "good article" template for no reason on the page. Http iosue (talk) 23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

again, same with last time, can you delete the revision history too. Http iosue (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined I've suppressed the revision and warned the user. Report to AIV and request oversight if they do it again. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Caspiane

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP WP:BLOCKEVASION. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Khatumo State

[edit]

Reason: Persistent vandalism Wowzers122 (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:31, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Sheikh Hasina

[edit]

Reason: WP:FORUM violations on talk and unexplained wholesale removal of content that was left unchecked for 2 weeks. Borgenland (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Radio Skid Row

[edit]

Reason: High level of vandalism from both IP and official company accounts removing information about a incident with a Jewish DJ. Pyramids09 (talk) 03:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

I've stubbed it instead and left a tag as the article doesn't currently demonstrate notability. Izno (talk) 04:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Major League Soccer

[edit]

Reason: Edit warring IP editing against consensus while talk page discussion is ongoing. Immediate disruption needs to be stopped. oknazevad (talk) 04:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

IP of interest, since I can see you're watching: Please 1) stop removing your comments (or stop making them if you don't believe them yourself), and 2) just stop edit warring while discussion continues. Izno (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
I was removing comments here because I didn't know if it was allowed for other's to leave comments here. It's not that I don't believe in them or myself (kinda rude to say), it's just I don't wanna get into any more trouble then the warning.
I just said that same thing within the MLS talking topic area, so no worries 2607:FEA8:4A5C:7600:5C3B:2C24:11FC:FDFE (talk) 04:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Axiom

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Remsense ‥ 论 04:53, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Artemis II

[edit]

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – New user engaging in disruptive editing despite attempts to reach out on talk page. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Zakk Wylde

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Tom Morello

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 05:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Slash (musician)

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Chinese Civil War

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 06:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

T.U.F.F. Puppy

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP editor keeps making edits claiming that T.U.F.F. Puppy is "not for children" using some of the flimsiest and most laughable logic I have ever seen (because it's rated TV-Y7 FV and not TV-Y - TV-Y7 FV is still considered children's programming, and the editor is seemingly unable to get it through that thick skull of theirs). While the edits are not constant, they have been occurring long enough to the point where it's considered disruptive. Enough is enough. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 06:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

First Sino-Japanese War

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 06:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

1911 Revolution

[edit]

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Remsense ‥ 论 06:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Matt Gaetz

[edit]

Extended confirmed protection: Repeated disruptive edits to the lead which, while understandable, create more work for other editors. Details about scandal/report are (rightfully) found both in the lead AND under "Re-opening of investigation by House Ethics Committee. However, additions to lead are being made that do not comply with Wikipedia guidelines Firecat93 (talk) 06:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Kharvi

[edit]

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Per WP:GSCASTE. - Ratnahastin (talk) 07:08, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

A-League Men records and statistics

[edit]

Reason: Protection is too high and it was for sockpuppetry in 2018. It's nearly 2025 now so if it needs protecting just do pending changes or semi-protection but unprotection would be better I think. 147.10.234.99 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging protecting admin User:Ponyo, who might or might not wish to have input. I looked at the history of disruption and it looks pretty bad. I'm inclined to give semi protection a shot (this would eliminate 95% of the disruption in page history), but I'd rather hear from the sysop who made the call first. BusterD (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Gary Radnich

[edit]

Unprotection: The action of semiprotecting this article was back in 2011, and the edit summary says something about an OTRS ticket from 2008 - regardless, the article has little views and littler edits, so I think page protection now is unnecessary. LR.127 (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Israel–Hamas war

[edit]

Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[43] to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[42]

Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Joe Biden

[edit]

Change his 2021 portrait to a newer one. Contact me further on my talk page to question this. 2601:483:400:1CD0:9C73:48C7:B39B:6E31 (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

That assumes we have a newer one to use. Unless it's uploaded to Commons we can't use a newer image; if a newer one does exist on Commons you need to link it here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Contact us/Readers

[edit]

Change the third bullet point from For vandalism... to If you spot vandalism.... Although this is a reader-facing page, and thus ought to minimize links, linking to WP:VAND specifically is important because it has a very precise definition in Wikipedia's content (hence the long list at WP:VANDNOT) Mach61 06:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Js (request) 2024-12-12 22:26 Fully protected (log) Protected by Lupin on 2006-01-25: "javascript template"
MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages (request) 2024-12-16 14:26 MediaWiki page (log) Unprotected by Cyberpower678 on 2018-11-20: "Breaks the RfX bot."
Module:WikiProject banner (request) 2024-12-18 22:58 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
MediaWiki:Tag-wikilove (request) 2024-12-19 15:12 MediaWiki page (log)
Movement for Democracy (Greece) (request) 2024-12-21 21:46 Not protected (log) Protected by Voorts on 2024-12-21: "Edit warring / content dispute"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
26 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Designation (request) 2024-12-03 05:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Chem2 (request) 2024-12-03 23:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2021-08-18: "High risk template."
Template:Nihongo (request) 2024-12-06 16:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-11-26: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Expand language (request) 2024-12-07 12:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Anomie on 2013-11-17: "Allow templateeditors to edit, per WT:RFPP#Mass protection lowering from "sysop" to "editprotected" (script-assisted edit)"
Template:Draft article (request) 2024-12-08 09:00 Template-protected (log) Protected by Gogo Dodo on 2015-05-02: "Highly visible template"
Template:Country data Syria (request) 2024-12-09 17:46 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:DYK tools (request) 2024-12-10 19:58 Template-protected (log) Protected by Hut 8.5 on 2016-12-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:Template for discussion/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anthony Appleyard on 2016-10-30: ""
Template:Tfm/dated (request) 2024-12-11 14:35 Template-protected (log) From Template:Tfm/dated: Protected by Ged UK on 2013-11-12: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox German place (request) 2024-12-15 12:52 Template-protected (log) From Template:Infobox German location: Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Taxobox (request) 2024-12-15 21:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox sportsperson (request) 2024-12-16 04:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-12-16 08:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-12-16 09:05 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox language/family-color (request) 2024-12-17 04:09 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:0 (request) 2024-12-17 10:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Ushr (request) 2024-12-18 04:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox rail (request) 2024-12-19 14:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Bracket (request) 2024-12-19 21:15 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xezbeth on 2016-04-13: "I forget that template editors are a thing"
Template:Authority control (request) 2024-12-23 02:06 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:PD-ineligible-USonly (request) 2024-12-23 04:44 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Pp-blp (request) 2024-12-23 06:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-02-03: "Highly visible template: 750+ transclusions"
Template:Wikia (request) 2024-12-23 19:35 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
User:AmandaNP/UAA/Whitelist (request) 2024-12-23 21:48 Template-protected (log) Modified by AmandaNP on 2020-07-24: "Try Template editor per main blacklist page"
Template:Cite wikisource (request) 2024-12-23 21:49 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Country alias/data (request) 2024-12-24 01:27 Template-protected (log) Protected by Primefac on 2019-02-04: "High-risk Lua module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:RFA

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 217 0 0 100 17:20, 25 December 2024 1 day, 9 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 07:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Royalesignature

[edit]

I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 03:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I recently raised issues of close paraphrasing in one of your drafts Special:Permalink/1263547974, I am sure if I check more of your creations now, I will find similar issues. Your creations need a second eye and that is what NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User:2003 LN6

[edit]

I am requesting autopatrolled rights mainly to streamline article creation so that my new articles would be reviewed faster. I have written around 40 articles, mostly about ants, and I would like to get this right to get the articles reviewed faster and reduce workload for new page patrollers. I have been an editor for four years, and my recent new articles have had no issues whatsoever from the reviewers. I will use this right responsibly, and it will be my pleasure to continue assisting my community in updating old articles and creating new content. 2003 LN6 06:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@2003 LN6 Just to clarify, having autopatrolled means your articles wouldn't be reviewed, not that they would get reviewed faster. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:58, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification. Reducing workload on the NPPs and to not have to wait for my article to get reviewed are my top priorities, so this would help greatly. 2003 LN6 15:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Based on private concerns + too little content-creation. I see a bunch of auto-notable stubs and a few redirects (which are extremely easy for NPP to review and generally does not require reduction). Nothing that demonstrates long-term engagement with our notability policies or other areas of content guidelines that we look for among folks who are AP. Sohom (talk) 09:24, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Aderiqueza

[edit]

I am writing to request for Autopatrolled right so as to ensure there is reduction in the workload of NPP process. Having created articles that conform to the content policies of Wikipedia and also learning from other experienced editors' suggestions to improve articles over the years, I believe this request is deserving, supported and this user right will be granted. Thanks Aderiqueza (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, your last article according to XTools was in two months ago in October, that does not indicate a requirement for this right. Additionally, your last article has editor removing unreliable sources, and making other fixes to it, indicating that your articles would still benefit for a second-look-over (which is what NPP is for). Sohom (talk) 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Crafterstar

[edit]

I have made a few articles that seem to be fine, and probably worth a consideration for this permission. Crafterstar (talk) 01:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Something like Marlo Kelly is the exact opposite of what we want to see from candidates for autopatrolled. Schwede66 01:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
@Schwede66: Crafterstar didn't create that. They created a redirect that was later turned into the article by someone else. – Joe (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
I shall take another look. Schwede66 12:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Crafterstar, sorry for my sloppy assessment. I'm unsure, though, whether you come to anywhere near 25 articles created, which is a condition for autopatrolled. Do you maintain a list somewhere? What shows up as articles created by you is often a redirect, or something extremely basic like this that was expanded by others before it left draft space. Cast lists do need to be referenced (e.g. The Venery of Samantha Bird) and the prose of The Strangers: Chapter 3 is almost half made up of a long quotation. What I've seen thus far isn't convincing, but I'm happy to take a closer look if you can provide a list of 25 articles created by you. Schwede66 20:43, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

apologies for wasting your time. Crafterstar (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Schwede66, if you are willing to look at the articles created here, from #371 to #383, then


Probably not good enough but just wanted your opinion. Crafterstar (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Saratoga Sam

[edit]

Nominating this editor for Autopatrolled based on a long history of high-quality page creation (80 new articles created in mainspace, with just one deleted a few years ago). Good encyclopedic style, excellent use of sources, images, formatting etc.; also creates talk pages. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

User:B.Korlah

[edit]

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights

Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log.

Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Panda Arun

[edit]

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Panda Arun (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 1 article. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. Primefac (talk) 20:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Crafterstar

[edit]

Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason.

I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 19:20, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Seems reasonable to me. Will give Dr vulpes a chance to opine before granting. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me, I'll review their work and report back. Thank you @Pppery for the ping. Dr vulpes (Talk) 09:12, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Milo8505

[edit]

I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

{{not done}} Fails minimum criteria. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
@Pppery Sorry, could you inform me of the criteria? I thought it was 500 total main space edits or 250 non-automated mainspace edits, which I pass, as I have more than 500 total mainspace edits.
Thank you and sorry for the inconveniences.
Milo8505 (talk) 08:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
No, you read it correctly and I interpreted the information I was looking at wrongly. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
So then, can I have it? Milo8505 (talk) 09:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
I haven't made any decision on that yet. My future self or a different admin will decide. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Mwwv

[edit]

Plan to use this to mass create and categorize redirects, as well as mass tagging pages with {{long comment}}. mwwv converse∫edits 14:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Frost

[edit]

I noticed that Ozzie10aaaa has posted AfC barnstars on dozens of user talk pages, containing unclosed code that should be closed with |} to ensure the style doesn't spill out to the rest of the talk page ([4]). I would like to use AWB to fix this. Also, I might need it occasionally for post-move cleanup on dozens of pages. Frost 18:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yuanmongolempiredynasty

[edit]

Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have been on Wikipedia for almost 30 days and have over 500 edits, I don’t believe I have gotten a notification that I am confirmed. If I have, please notify me. Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoconfirmed" user right. — MusikBot talk 19:40, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Your account is already autoconfirmed, but you may be confusing this with "extended confirmed" that you have not yet reached as your account is only about 25 days old. stwalkerster (talk) 01:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Boutboul

[edit]

Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. I understand the importance of maintaining trust and adhering to Wikipedia’s policies, and I’ve since reflected on how to better contribute responsibly.

Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality.

I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing.

Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([5]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 12:30, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Serfunoheda

[edit]

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Serfunoheda (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Hello! I would like to get a permission, so I can translate a page. I've been registered in Wikipedia for a long period and I made quiet a lot of edits. Thank you in advance!

 Not done You haven't been registered that long, and haven't made that many edits. Chetsford (talk) 23:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:DancingOwl

[edit]

On November 28 my EC permissions has been restored by Chetsford (talk · contribs) for 30 days, and I was told that prior to expiration I should return here and request it to be permanently added to my account.
DancingOwl (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done, @DancingOwl: Chetsford (talk) 17:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
thanks DancingOwl (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.

Event coordinator

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:1ctinus

[edit]

For the NPP backlog drive. This is my second time participating in one of these drives (hopefully I will be healthier and less busy this time...) -1ctinus📝🗨 02:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User:EF5

[edit]

The January backlog drive seems interesting and I need something to do over Christmas break/beyond. I applied for a month-long trial a while back, but was having some mental health issues and just didn't use the tools or even re-apply. My AfC log is relatively lengthy over a period of 3 months. A note about my AfD stats, they are inaccurate. For some reason, when changing my name from "Sir MemeGod" to "EF5", XTools bugged out and only shows random AfDs I've filed/commented on (hence the 90-or-so "no vote detected" ones). EF5 17:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

@EF5: Could you explain what happened with Draft:Artwork at the Pentagon, from your perspective? The history is puzzling. – Joe (talk) 10:50, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe: Sure! I was on an "artwork at the ____" list-making spree (see List of artwork at the United States Capitol complex and Artwork at the World Trade Center (1973–2001)), and I tried my luck at the Pentagon. It would be PRODed for WP:NLIST reasons, which is fair, I didn't know that WP:NOTDATABASE existed at the time, and to avoid it being deleted, I just moved it to draftspace where I could work on it. I guess I forgot about it. I know that doesn't excuse the OR concerns, I guess I just forgot to cite some material, which I'm usually careful about. :) EF5 12:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
@EF5You do realize that the OR concerns are a direct by-product of not following WP:NLIST and not because you forgot to cite material? Sohom (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
That too, it's a mixture. In my opinion, one self-draftified (I'm fully aware it not meeting NLIST was why I draftified it) article shouldn't impede on the seventy-nine newer articles that I've made after that, none of which are tagged (from what I know). I was given the tools for a trial in late-October, and hopefully my few reviews were at least sufficient. EF5 02:49, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:CSMention269

[edit]

I've been an AFC reviewer (probationary since March 24). I was off-wiki for some time to take a long break, but I'm back again. Can I get this right for a temporary period of 7 days? I want to explore the difference between New Page Curation and AFC tools. I will request a few more trials later before taking it permanently. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done, that's not how rights work on enwiki. If you want to test something, feel free to ask for the NPR right on testwiki. Sohom (talk) 00:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Then I will come after a month for requesting the right to clear the backlog drive for February 2025 if required. Thank you. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 02:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Skyshifter

[edit]

In August, I was granted the new page reviewer permission temporarily (link). Due to some IRL stuff I wasn't very active with it, though none of my reviews were problematic. With the upcoming January 2025 Backlog drive, I'd like to re-request the permission to help reduce the backlog. Skyshiftertalk 15:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done, for a (approx 2 month) trial Sohom (talk) 00:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Neveselbert

[edit]

As an editor with over 80,000 edits since joining in 2015, I'm also a pending changes reviewer. I've moved over 2,000 pages during my time, made over 200 edits at WP:RM/TR to request uncontroversial page moves and participated almost 400 times in requested moves.

My immediate need for this permission stems from my efforts to retitle redirects in line with policies such as WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE. I'm currently unable to move dozens of redirects I've created to more appropriate titles because the desired titles already exist with different tags. This process would be far more efficient with the page mover tool, allowing me to address these titles without requiring frequent requests at WP:RM/TR. Thanks, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Neveselbert, can you give me a few examples of the redirects you're talking about? Why is it necessary to move them instead of just copying over the tags? I'll also say I'm concerned about all of this: while page mover is a somewhat less sensitive permission than template editor, it's still one that requires a lot of care, especially if you're planning on moving large numbers of pages at once. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 11:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi Extraordinary Writ, I'm referring to the redirects in Category:Premierships of Great Britain and Category:Premierships of the United Kingdom, the majority of which I created years ago. As for why it's necessary, WP:CUTPASTE is one reason, as I'd like to maintain the page history, and another is that it's extremely tedious to have to copy over tags and categories over dozens of pages. As for the template editor issue, I made a mistake under pressure at a time when I wasn't in a good place. I apologised and accepted that my conduct fell short of what was required, although I would point out that I managed to remain in relatively good stead as a TE for about six years. I'm proposing to use the PM right sparingly, and the only number of pages I would move at once would be these redirects and those requested at WP:RM/T. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 22:16, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
So the idea is to move redirects like Premiership of Augustus FitzRoy, 3rd Duke of Grafton to titles like Premiership of the Duke of Grafton? I don't really understand why that'd be worth doing: both redirects are valid, and it's not worth worrying about which title is best when there isn't an article yet. (I realize only one redirect can be in the category, but still...) I suspect if you requested one of these at RM/TR, it'd be declined as not a useful move. Is there something I'm missing? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
I find the page history argument to be lacking; I suspect there is little to no substantial history on a majority of these sorts of redirects (especially, as you say, if they were all created by yourself). Moving a redirect to another redirect and then editing the original redirect to point to the original target just to save a copy/paste seems like more effort than just editing the second redirect. Primefac (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
It would be vastly less effort with WP:AWB, which I have experience with. I'd just have to substitute {{target of}} after the fact. A copy/paste for dozens of redirects isn't something I'd be able to automate. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
@Extraordinary Writ: Yes, that's the general idea. I think it's worth doing on a personal level since I created the vast majority of these redirects in the first place. Both are valid, of course, but I feel the more concise titles would be more in line with WP:TITLECON. For example, both First premiership of the Duke of Wellington and Death and state funeral of the Duke of Wellington will be in the same category, Category:Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington. In any case, it's far more likely that such a premiership(s) article will follow the same pattern as the "Death and state funeral" title, so this would save having to swap categories and the like from First premiership of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington to First premiership of the Duke of Wellington. It's a tedious task but one I'd appreciate the ability to undertake. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:39, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
I am not comfortable handing out page-mover when your main use case is unusual and difficult-to-justify moves; I think they deserve more scrutiny than they'd get if you were making them unilaterally. I'm also not sure why you think page mover would save you time: these would have to be individual round-robin swaps, which take at least as long as copying and pasting.  Not done. I continue to think you'd be better off leaving well enough alone here, but if this particular set of moves is really important to you, leave me a note and we can try to find a way forward. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:ToadetteEdit

[edit]

Good evening! I have had this permission on a temporary basis on May 20th of this year. I had then requested an extension of said right but was declined on the basis of weak communication capabilities and questionable RM closures being made during my trial. Four months passed, and I therefore request to receive the right (okay for another temporary basis to prove my competency).

A month ago, I returned to wp:RM/TR clerking, contesting certain requests and processing them. I could only process (fulfill) the simplest requests, that is, requests that don't require use of the suppressredirect, tboverride or delete-redirect rights bundled with the requesting user group in question. Having page mover rights will enable me to process more pending requests rather than wait for another user to fulfill them.

I am also planning to return back to NPP and AFC activity, due to the fact that I will be on holiday (and therefore, increased online activity) and due to the upcoming backlog drive for the former. suppressredirect would be helpful to carry out draftifications, and also to allow moving drafts to titles which have history that would've been eligible for G6 deletion.

For obvious reasons, I will not (and must not) work in the requested moves venue outside RM/TR (disclaimer:I have been topic banned from closing/relisting discussions four months ago). I have also improved my communication skills and will try to be as clear as possible. I am open to any questions regarding this request or my competency.

Thank you for reading my request. ToadetteEdit (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. I'm glad that there have been fewer issues in the last couple of months, but when the previous problems were so extensive they led to a topic ban, four months isn't long enough for me to be comfortable re-granting the right. For now, maybe consider participating in RM discussions: not only is it recommended for would-be page movers, it's a great way to show both knowledge of policy and improved communication skills. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
So... I will attempt to participate in RMs more. Thank yoi for responding to my request. ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Panda Arun

[edit]

Reason for Requesting page mover rights. Panda Arun (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Primefac (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Gwanki

[edit]

I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Beachweak

[edit]

Have close to 1,100 edits as of making this request. I enjoy improving articles, I review recent changes daily by this point and am familiar with reverting vandalism (and distinguishing it from good faith edits). Having this right would mean I can instantly decline bad faith pending edits as soon as I see them. I have read and understood the relevant policies and guidelines relating to pending changes, vandalism and copyright. Beachweak (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Freedoxm

[edit]

Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Lewisguile

[edit]

I am an active editor with page creation review rights and over 5,000 edits to date. I try to keep my edits neutral and have a history of working with others on some contentious topics. If I make a mistake, I try to fix it and apologise as soon as possible. I have a good grasp of WP policy and MOS, and understand the difference between vandalism, tendentious editing and unconstructive editing. I've also got a very good grasp of copyright law (UK and US) and plagiarism due to my academic and professional background. Lewisguile (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Plasticwonder

[edit]

I would like to request the pending changes reviewer right for the following reasons:

1. I am highly active in anti vandalism areas of the enwiki (AIV, RPP, etc, I even contributed to SPI) so I know what vandalism looks like when I see it.

2. I see a lot of constructive edits when I am on the "recent changes" section, that go unnoticed for quite a while. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PersonAccount

[edit]

I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PersonAccount, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

User:NXcrypto

[edit]

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Cmrc23

[edit]

Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training on this page and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Grumpylawnchair

[edit]

I would like rollback to help me combat vandalism more effectively. I currently use recent changes and RedWarn. I feel that I have the experience necessary to handle vandalism in a constructive manner. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Randomdude121

[edit]

Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Plasticwonder

[edit]

I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Obversa

[edit]
I am requesting rollback rights to revert an edit by another user that merged Baroque Pinto with Friesian Sporthorse, without prior authorization or agreement, on 15 November 2024 - a higher-up editor or administrator previously denied a merge request due to "no consensus" in January 2024 - or allowing other users to discuss or dispute the page merge, as indicated for the procedure on Wikipedia: Merging. I have been trying to recover the Baroque Pinto page that was merged into Friesian Sporthorse without success, and need administrator assistance or intervention in order to revert or roll back the merge. Obversa (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
    Category tracker

    Immediate requests

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 50
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 9
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 5

    Deletion

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 505
    Templates for deletion 157
    Categories for deletion 285
    Wikipedia files for discussion 41
    All redirects for discussion 302
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 21
    Possible copyright violations 7
    All articles proposed for deletion 299
    All files proposed for deletion 197
    Unsorted AfD debates 0
    All files with the same name on Commons 24
    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 421
    Unknown copyright status 60
    Unknown source 58
    No non-free use rationale 1
    Replaceable non-free use images 15
    Disputed non-free use images 45

    Page protection

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,241
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 440
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,361
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    [edit]

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,200 0.49
    All articles needing rewrite 6,019 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,333 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 40,055 0.58

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 11,162 0.16
    All articles with unsourced statements 536,209 7.74
    All articles lacking sources 71,261 1.03
    All unreferenced BLPs 3 0
    All articles needing additional references 475,291 6.86
    All articles needing references cleanup 4,609 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 105,540 1.52
    All articles with dead external links 316,102 4.56

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 138 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 19 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles to be merged 1,050 0.02
    All articles to be split 814 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 17 -
    Stub categories 19,281 -
    All uncategorized pages 653 0.01
    All orphaned articles 53,429 0.77
    All articles needing copy edit 2,428 0.04
    All articles with style issues 19,609 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,759 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 16,518 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    [edit]
    Category Entries
    Requested moves 432
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 7,336
    All accuracy disputes 15,754
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 0
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 5
    All articles to be expanded 65,998

    Special pages

    [edit]
    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    [edit]

    Hong Kong

    [edit]
    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    [edit]
    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Winhunter&oldid=1190483781"