Talk:Prophecy
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prophecy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James Randi on Prophecy
[edit]James Randi has a section on Prophecy in his "An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult and Supernatural" [1], unfortunately the online entry appears to be a dead link and wayback machine does not work either. HealthyGirl (talk) 16:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Extra point of criticism that might be added
[edit]Does anyone know of a reliable source that argues that the very idea of prophecy unwittingly voids the legitimacy of any religion that preaches it? I think this would make an invaluable, logical addition to the article under the Skepticism section. Simply put, if there is a religion that includes prophecies in its corpus that will be (claimed to be) fulfilled in days, weeks, months, years or an indeterminate time in the future then a person should feel compelled to defer accepting that religion until every last prophecy is fulfilled. All it would take to void a religion's legitimacy is one unfulfilled prophecy, so, for example, if a religion falsely claimed that in 1000 years' time the sky would turn green then between that time generations of suckers would have followed a false religion while ignorantly trusting that the prophecy would indeed eventuate. As far as I'm aware, all religions include prophecies among their beliefs, so all — almost paradoxically — voided their own legitimacy in their haste to gain legitamacy (by making pronouncements on the future). 202.161.71.234 (talk) 03:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Prophecy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080118125244/http://www.csulb.edu/~dsteiger/maimonides.htm to http://www.csulb.edu/~dsteiger/maimonides.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0411/is_3-4_53/ai_n14730101 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.idmji.org/index.php/en/historiaiglesia - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120904131728/http://islam.thetruecall.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=357 to http://islam.thetruecall.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=357
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110425152322/http://www.thebeginner.eu/curious/481-the-fallacy-of-prophecy to http://www.thebeginner.eu/curious/481-the-fallacy-of-prophecy
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Short description
[edit]Shortened description per WP:SDSHORT. Editor2020 (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Drawing of David and Saul
[edit]According to judiasm Saul was not a prophet and therefore isn't connected to the article on prophets in judiasm. see prophets in judiasm גוי אחד בארץ (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- C-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Charismatic Christianity articles
- Top-importance Charismatic Christianity articles
- WikiProject Charismatic Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Top-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Top-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class Anthropology articles
- Unknown-importance Anthropology articles
- C-Class Oral tradition articles
- Unknown-importance Oral tradition articles
- Oral tradition taskforce articles