Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Journalism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Michael Savage

[edit]

Michael Savage has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle

[edit]

There is a discussion at the Reliable sources/Noticeboard about the reliability of the Jewish Chronicle, interested editors can see the discussion here WP:RSN#RFC Jewish Chronicle. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 19:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for The American Israelite

[edit]

The American Israelite has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We suggest a new article topic

[edit]

There is currently no article on The Foreign Press Association London, which appears mentioned, for the regular journalism awards it gives, in the en.wikipedia articles for Isobel Yeung, Nazenin Ansari, Oliver Burkeman, Ramita Navai, Bénédicte Paviot, Fiona Harvey, S. J. Goldsmith, and others.

Note, there exists a well-cited WP page for the Hollywood FPA (of course), but also one for a very sparsely referenced Turkish FPA. These are mentioned in particular, (i) to state that if the Turkish is notable, then the variously referenced one in London surely is, and (ii) to note that finding other references to FPA London in WP is challenging, because of the poor search utilities, which, as it stands, return many hits of the Hollywood FPA, and then the many hits of the individual search terms. (Also at issue is whether, in articles, the name appears as FPA London, London FPA, and with or without "The", hyphens, etc.)

Returning to FPA London, per se: apart from its widely recognised award-granting function, and its Observer status on the National Committee for the Safety of Journalists, it is a not-for-profit "Friendly Society", and the UK Press Card Authority providing the accreditation to thousands of international correspondents that gives them access to Royal and Parliamentary (and other high level government) events, briefings and film opportunities.

According to its website, see following, it is the "first and oldest association of foreign journalists in the world, founded in 1888", a history of sufficient interest to appear as the subject of a book volume, see:

  • Goldsmith, S.J., ed. (1988). Britain in the Eye of the World: The Foreign Press Association in London, 1888-1988. London: Foreign Press Association. ISBN 9780905734019..

Here is the organisation's current web page.

We suggest creation of a short stub, which for regular editors can easily be accomplished after creating a page, adding a temporary

tag, and revealing the links to the news, newspaper, etc. source types, to proceed. 73.211.140.61 (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Neal Boortz

[edit]

Neal Boortz has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources noticeboard discussion on a zine/magazine called Indie Vision Music

[edit]

There is currently a discussion about its reliability. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Indie_Vision_Music Graywalls (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Technique (newspaper)

[edit]

Technique (newspaper) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 03:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Clean Singing, Teeth of the Divine, Metal Underground, The Metal Onslaught

[edit]

I've started a discussion at WP:RS/N regarding these sources and if they are reliable. Input at that discussion would be appreciated, please.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Maxence Melo Mubyazi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:G11. This is clearly promotional, essentially a resume. Citations do not show sufficient notability per WP:N, and there are very few independent sources online about him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spookyaki (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Subjectivity and objectivity (philosophy)#Requested move 7 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Mark Kellogg (reporter)

[edit]

Mark Kellogg (reporter) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:43, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance of Women Film Journalists

[edit]

Can someone please take a look at this article and explain/fix why the 2006 awards aren't mentioned? CapnZapp (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

crossposting on WikiProject Journalism and WikiProject Women's History